grist for the mill

A not-so-secret research cache

Tuesday, March 23, 2004

 
Wired News: Supremes Weigh In on ID Debate: "'The government could require name tags, color codes,' Hiibel's lawyer, Robert Dolan, told the court.

At the heart of the case is an intersection of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches, and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Hiibel claims both of those rights were violated.




Justice Antonin Scalia, however, expressed doubts. He said officers faced with suspicious people need authority to get the facts.




'I cannot imagine any responsible citizen would have objected to giving the name,' Scalia said.




Justices are revisiting their 1968 decision that said police may briefly detain someone on reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, without the stronger standard of probable cause, to get more information. Nevada argues that during such brief detentions, known as Terry stops after the 1968 ruling, people should be required to answer questions about their identities. "





<< Home

Archives

April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   September 2006   January 2007   November 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?